Opened 11 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#68 closed enhancement (fixed)

Various case and term issues

Reported by: Claire West Owned by: Gunther Schadow
Priority: minor Milestone: Revision 1.9
Component: Keywords:

Description (last modified by Gunther Schadow)

I have just started to use UCUM for standardisation of units for clinical laboratory data and have some comments:

  1. In Table 6: there are c/i units for [eps_0] and [mu_0]. Shouldn't these be in uppercase?
  1. In table 18: there is a c/i unit for [IN_i’HG]. Shouldn't this be uppercase?
  1. In table 24 there are c/i units for KG{wet’tis} and MG{creat}. Shouldn't these be uppercase?
  1. In Appendix D there is a term /g{tot’ptot}. Shouldn't this be prot rather than ptot?
  1. There is inconsistent use of (c/i)terms for heart beat:

In Appendix D

In Appendix A:
Please clarify.

  1. In table 5 There is a name for ‘are’ denoting area. Should this be 'area'?
  1. In appendix D, I find ambiguity in the use of ‘per’ and ‘and’ in the following nested examples:

meq/(kg.d) = milliequivalent per kilogram per day
meq/(kg.min) = milliequivalent per kilogram and minute.
Does ‘and ‘ actually mean ‘and per’?
Section 2.2 7 (algebraic unit terms) talks as the period as an operator for multiplication but this doesn’t seem to be borne out by the examples. Please clarify

I am not an expert in this field so please pardon any ignorance on my part!

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by Gunther Schadow

Milestone: Revision 1.9
Type: defectenhancement

There are several issues here:

  • As for c/i terms using lower case - strictly not a problem (as long as case does not matter, we could write in all lower case) but we should turn to upper case for consistency's sake.
  • ptot - prot is a spelling issue, to be fixed
  • {h'b} vs. {H.B.} is in curly braces and has no semantic value at all, but we shall remove the H.B. in favor of h'b because we avoid the period everywhere else.
  • the unite "are" is correct spelling in English (German it's just "ar")
  • and is ok for reading the unit, it is in fact less ambiguous than reading the "per" twice, if any change I would change the second "per" to "and" in all cases.
  • the period for multiplication is definitely used and there are many examples, including the ones you cite "meq/(kg.min) -- multiplication of kg and min in the denominator under kg.

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by Gunther Schadow

Owner: set to Gunther Schadow
Status: newassigned

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by Gunther Schadow

Description: modified (diff)
Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

capitalization fixed.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.